Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CV-1635 Blocker v. DC Mar 16, 2000 Affirmed Weisberg
98-CF-695 Salley v. US Mar 16, 2000 Affirmed Rankin
98-CV-1497 Anthony L. Ray v. Thomas H. Queen. Mar 16, 2000
97-CV-881 Donzell W. Moorehead v. DC Mar 16, 2000
98-FM-402 T.S. v. M.C.S. Mar 16, 2000
98-CF-852 Armstead v. US Mar 15, 2000 Affirmed Burgess
98-CV-619 Stevens v. DC Mar 15, 2000 Affirmed Bowers
98-cv-1499 Beebe v. Gardens Mar 15, 2000 Affirmed Braman
98-CO-602 Johnson v. US Mar 15, 2000 Affirmed Bartnoff
98-CV-1257 Cristos v. Holt Mar 15, 2000 Affirmed Keary

Pagination

Total 16196 items