Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CM-942 Mangrum v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Morrison
96-CF-127, 98-CO-899 Collier v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Kramer
98-CV-1466 Boyd v. Weschler Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Lopez
99-CO-322 Wellington v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Richter
97-CO-704 Long v. US Mar 17, 2000 Affirmed Suda
98-CF-729 Wren v. US Mar 17, 2000 Affirmed Jackson
99-CF-180 Cantizano v. US Mar 17, 2000 Affirmed Beck
98-CF-1791 Puifory v. US Mar 17, 2000 Affirmed Richter
98-CM-1538 Bnoden v. US Mar 17, 2000 Affirmed Morin
98-CV-1412 Chevy Chase Exec. Serv. v. Temps & Co. Mar 16, 2000 Affirmed Weisberg

Pagination

Total 16196 items