Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CV-92 Allison Marie Judah v. Burton Reiner and Morris Management, Inc. Feb 03, 2000
97-CV-1584 Crestar Bank v. Eric L. Cheevers. Feb 03, 2000
97-CV-1170 Jerry D. Massie v. District of Columbia. Feb 03, 2000
97-CF-282, 97-CF-685 Troy Thompson and Tyrone D. Hall v. United States. Feb 03, 2000
97-CF-1670, 97-CF-1773 Deon M. Maddox and Lamar M. Davis v. United States. Feb 03, 2000
98-CV-1159 Walter Seigel v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Feb 03, 2000
96-CT-1376 Lisa M. Harvey v. District of Columbia. Feb 03, 2000
98-BG-1751 In re: Lorenzo Randle. Feb 03, 2000
96-CF-1393 James O. Grayton v. United States. Feb 03, 2000
97-FM-1862 Addison-Wright v. Lomacky Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16186 items