Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
14-CF-683 Williams v. United States Oct 31, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-527 RFB Prop., LLC, v. Federal National Mortgage Association Oct 27, 2022 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
18-CF-343 Brown v. United States Oct 27, 2022 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
20-CO-89 Palencia v. United States Oct 27, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-1112 Quaranta v. DC Dep't of Employment Services Oct 27, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
22-BG-627 In re Cynn Oct 27, 2022 Per Curiam
21-BG-743 In re Chapman Oct 27, 2022 Associate Judge AliKhan
20-CV-373 Middleton v. Howard University, et al. Oct 26, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CF-531 Hamid v. United States Oct 24, 2022 Remanded in part; affirmed in part Per Curiam
22-BG-461 In re Choi Oct 20, 2022 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16196 items