Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-CV-0402 Reid v. Dunklin, et al. Feb 27, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-1287 Crosby v. Brown Feb 23, 2023 Associate Judge Howard
19-CV-0480 Jones v. Catholic University of America Feb 23, 2023 Affirmed
18-PR-1236 Govan v. SunTrust Bank, et al. Feb 23, 2023 Associate Judge Easterly
17-CO-0983 Williams v. United States Feb 21, 2023 Affirmed
21-CV-0122 & 22-CV-0058 Rayner v. Yale Steam Laundry Condo. Ass'n.  Feb 16, 2023 Senior Judge Ferren
21-PR-0323 In re Estate of Arthur M. Watson Feb 15, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-0597 Sim Development, LLC v. District of Columbia, et al. Feb 15, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-0564 Zelaya v. Strange Feb 14, 2023 Reversed Per Curiam
21-CO-0312 White v. United States Feb 14, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16184 items