Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-BG-229 In re: Eugene Oak. Feb 25, 1999
97-TX-1442 School Street Associates Limited Partnership v. District of Columbia. Feb 25, 1999
97-BG-1988 In re: John Franklin Lillard, III. Feb 25, 1999
97-AA-1512 The Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. Feb 25, 1999
96-CV-545 Dr. Robert B. Coleman v. District of Columbia. Feb 25, 1999
96-CO-295, 96-CO-199, 96-CO-301 Michael A. Diamen, Joseph Nick Sousa, and Joseph Wayne Eastridge v. United States. Feb 25, 1999
95-CF-1178 Gregory Bennett v. United States. Feb 25, 1999
95-BG-909 In re: Barry C. Stiller. Feb 25, 1999
98-BG-873 In re: David J. Ontell. Feb 18, 1999
96-CV-1863, 97-CV-857 Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. v. Cheleen Jefferson. Feb 18, 1999

Pagination

Total 16180 items