Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
24-CF-0555 Poe v. United States Apr 24, 2026 Affirmed Per Curiam
26-BG-0209 In re Payne Apr 23, 2026 Per Curiam
25-BG-0333 In re Robinson Apr 23, 2026 Associate Judge Beckwith
26-BG-0127 In re Brammer Apr 23, 2026 Per Curiam
24-CO-0336 Tornero v. United States Apr 23, 2026 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-0016 Gibbs v. United States Apr 23, 2026 Associate Judge Howard; concurring opinion by Senior Judge Glickman
24-PR-0868 In re Grijalva; Judith del Cuadro-Zimmerman Apr 23, 2026 Associate Judge Easterly
24-CV-1001 Dargan v. D.C. Office of Employee Appeals, et al. Apr 17, 2026 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-CV-1010 Khatri v. University of the District of Columbia Apr 14, 2026 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-CF-0296 Webster v. United States Apr 10, 2026 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items