Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
23-PR-0970 Bennett, et al. v. Bennett, et al. Apr 09, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-0773 Graham v. United States Apr 07, 2025 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
24-BG-0433 In re Carter Apr 03, 2025 Associate Judge Shanker
24-BG-1146 In re Williams Apr 03, 2025 Per Curiam
24-CF-0007 Maldonado v. United States Apr 02, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-AA-0854 Dunn v. D.C. Department of Employment Services Apr 02, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-CV-0563 & 23-CV-0051 Sims v. US Bank National Association Apr 01, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
24-CV-0447 Hinton v. North West Dental Care, et al. Apr 01, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-FM-0685 Riley v. Deskovich Mar 31, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
24-CV-0176 Coleman v. Oasis Realty, LLC, et al. Mar 31, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16155 items