Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
96-BG-1642 In re Gary A. Courtois. Nov 30, 1998
97-AA-1504 Stephen Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Nov 30, 1998
97-BG-1514 In re Andrew M. Steinberg. Nov 30, 1998
97-CO-1646 Bernard A. Mahaise v. United States. Nov 30, 1998
98-BG-337 In re: Evangeline Covington. Nov 19, 1998
97-CM-402 Michael L. Hallmon v. United States. Nov 12, 1998
98-BG-1521 In the Matter of Dennis Laskin. Nov 12, 1998
97-SP-1282 In re: A. Scott Bolden. Nov 12, 1998
97-BG-656 In re Mark Bendet. Nov 12, 1998
96-CV-250 District of Columbia, Donna Wilson and Bernard Anderson, M.D. v. Cuthbert O. Simpkins, M.D. Nov 12, 1998

Pagination

Total 16155 items