Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CV-598 Jeffrey Mayberry v. James Antonio Dukes. Dec 09, 1999
97-CV-1402 Kevin Word, et al. v. Potomac Electric Power Company. Dec 09, 1999
95-BG-875 In re: Annette Regent. Dec 09, 1999
93-CF-621, 97-CO-228, 97-CO-1834 Fred L. Frederick v. United States. Dec 09, 1999
98-CO-1404 Peoples v. US Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed
97-CF-2010 Taylor v. US Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed
97-CF-1944 Atkins v. US Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed
98-CV-410 Griffin v. DC Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed
97-CM-1745 Hines v. US Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed
98-CV-983 Thorpe v. Independence Federal Savings Bank Dec 08, 1999 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16158 items