Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CF-101 Ronald E. Bates v. United States. Jun 15, 2000
98-CV-1872 Jibril L. Ibrahim v. District of Columbia. Jun 15, 2000
99-CF-319 Randolph O. Williams v. United States. Jun 15, 2000
98-BG-161 In re Michael R. Gross. Jun 15, 2000
98-BG-1295 In re David S. Sabghir. Jun 15, 2000
97-FS-1160 In re B.B.P. Jun 15, 2000
97-CV-1509 Future View, Inc. v. CritiCom, Inc. Jun 15, 2000
86-CF-696, 94-CO-1420 Keith W. Yancey v. United States. Jun 15, 2000
97-FM-1191 Theresa C. Atkinson v. Lewis K. Atkinson. Jun 10, 2000
95-CM-919 Sean H. Henry v. US Jun 08, 2000