Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
96-CF-745, 99-O-943 Simmons v. US Jul 03, 2000 Affirmed
97-CV-1522, 97-CV-676 Whitehead v. WMATA Jul 03, 2000 Affirmed
97-BS-1872 In re: Donald A. Doheny Jr. Jun 29, 2000
98-CV-1638 Jacqueline Paterson v. ARCO Management of Washington, DC Inc. Jun 29, 2000
95-FM-1501 William A. Mitchell v. Christine R. Hughes. Jun 29, 2000
94-BG-1280 In re: Ronald E. Tucker. Jun 29, 2000
98-CV-628, 98-CV-699 Judy Sabir, et al., v. DC, et al. Jun 29, 2000
99-BG-736 In re: Frank A.K. Awuah. Jun 29, 2000
98-CF-502 Newman v. US Jun 28, 2000 Affirmed
99-AA-21 Reath v. DC DOES Jun 27, 2000 Affirmed