Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CF-671 Erhabor v. US Mar 31, 2000 Affirmed Wynn
98-FS-1727 In re J.A.P., D.P. Mar 31, 2000
99-BG-651 In re: Vincent D. Paragano. Mar 30, 2000
99-BG-823 In re: James R. Boykins. Mar 30, 2000
98-CV-1677 Irving Robinson v. DC Mar 30, 2000
98-BG-446 In re: Leonard W. Krouner. Mar 30, 2000
98-BG-230, 98-BG-478 In re: Thomas E. Barlow. Mar 30, 2000
00-BG-120 In re: Larry Gordon. Mar 30, 2000
96-CV-428 Luella S. Christopher v. William J. Bethune. Mar 30, 2000
98-CM-1109 Barlow v. US Mar 30, 2000 Affirmed Rankin

Pagination

Total 16196 items