Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
22-CM-0611 Medhin v. United States Feb 08, 2024 Associate Judge Easterly
22-CV-0033 Nawaz v. Bloom Residential, LLC, et al. Feb 08, 2024 Associate Judge Easterly
22-CV-0997 Osman v. First Priority Mgmt. Feb 08, 2024 Senior Judge Thompson; dissenting opinion by Associate Judge McLeese
21-AA-0383 Powell v. D.C. Dep't. of Employment Services Feb 08, 2024 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-AA-0575 Booz Allen Hamilton v. D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue Feb 08, 2024 Associate Judge McLeese
21-CM-0500 Wolf v. United States Feb 05, 2024 Vacated Per Curiam
22-BG-0827 In re Diviacchi Feb 01, 2024 Associate Judge Easterly
23-BG-0480 In re Sloane Feb 01, 2024 Per Curiam
23-BG-0958 In re Layton Feb 01, 2024 Per Curiam
23-BG-0764 In re Brent Feb 01, 2024 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16180 items