Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
17-AA-1071 Antoinette Bell v. DC DOES Feb 27, 2019 Affirmed
17-AA-1196 Atricia Armstead v. DC DOES Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed
17-CV-1420 Rowena Joyce Scott v. DC Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed Hon. John M. Mott
16-CV-1011 In re Wilfred Welsh Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed Hon. Ronna Lee Beck
17-CM-709+ Russell C. Davis v. US Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed Hon. Frederick H. Weisberg
17-CV-1311 Sterling J. Johnson v. Federal National Mortgage Association Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed Hon. Neal E. Kravitz
17-CV-1372 Patt Chaney-Watson v. John Fang Feb 22, 2019 Affirmed Hon. Joan Zeldon
14-CF-839+ Willie Walker, Jr. v. U.S. Feb 21, 2019
16-CF-1126 Deandre J. Posey v. U.S. Feb 21, 2019
17-FM-61 B.R.L.F. v. Lilian Marleny Sarceno Zuniga Feb 21, 2019

Pagination

Total 16184 items