Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
18-AA-117 Wang v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board & 1642 U Street, Inc. D/B/A Chi-Cha Lounge Oct 18, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CV-1125 Taylor v.  Thomas and ReMax 2000 Oct 18, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-PR-627 In re Brenda L. Washington; Bruce E. Gardner Oct 18, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-PR-1177 In Re Pearl Robinson; Bruce E. Gardner  Oct 17, 2019 Per Curiam
18-BG-803 In Re Jay S. Weiss Oct 17, 2019 Per Curiam
17-CM-1181 Henry v. United States Oct 16, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CF-1417 Shuler v. United States Oct 16, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-FM-11 Ettridge v. Turtil Oct 16, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-CF-1189 Harris v. United States  Oct 16, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-469 Taylor v. Thomas Oct 15, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items