Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
18-AA-754 Thompson v. DC. DOES and WAMATA Dec 20, 2019 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
17-CV-253 Dargan v. D.C. Office of Employee Appeals Dec 20, 2019 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
18-CV-97 Lattisaw v. District of Columbia Dec 20, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CO-939 Wright v. United States Dec 20, 2019 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-191 Civic v. Signature Collision Centers, LLC & H.P. West End, LLC Dec 19, 2019 Judge McLeese
17-BG-1053 In Re Frederick Schwartz, Jr Dec 19, 2019 Per Curiam
19-BG-658 In Re Stuart R. Blatt Dec 19, 2019 Per Curiam
19-BG-886 In Re Jonathan K. O'Neill Dec 19, 2019 Per Curiam
19-BG-672 In Re Charles A. Murray  Dec 19, 2019 Per Curiam
19-BG-894 In Re Richard M. Blank Dec 19, 2019 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items