Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
14-BG-1468 In re Timothy D. Naegele Feb 27, 2020 Per Curiam
19-FM-49 Kerns v. Chikuni Feb 27, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-330+ Washington Gas Light Company, et al. v. Whitt Feb 26, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-73 Shropshire v. DC DOES & DC Water and Sewer Authority Feb 26, 2020 Affirmed in Part, Vacated in Part Per Curiam
17-CV-1386 Tag B Holdings v. 501 K St Prop Feb 21, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-BG-152 In re Abigail Askew Feb 20, 2020 Per Curiam
18-BG-340 In re Wendell Robinson Feb 20, 2020 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
18-CV-801 United Black Fund v. United Way Feb 20, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-605 Mallory v. Bomardier Trans. Feb 19, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CF-593 Thomas v. United States  Feb 19, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items