Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
17-CO-792 Shade, Jr. v. United States May 07, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CM-1171 Rogers v. United States May 07, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
15-CM-1404 Stroud v. United States May 07, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-1134 Baldwin v. DC Office of Employee Appeals & DC Dept. of Youth Services May 07, 2020 Associate Judge Thompson
19-AA-270 Hopeful v. DC ABCB May 06, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-AA-725 Gaudi v. DC DCRA May 06, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-0032 Spriggs v. United States May 06, 2020 Reversed Per Curiam
18-CF-124 Dawes v. United States May 06, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-163 Tonson v. Wells Fargo May 06, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-BG-114 In re Marla L. Stein Apr 30, 2020 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items