Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
18-CF-432 Fitzgerald v US  Jun 04, 2020 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
19-CV-405 Michael Sindram v Mathew Hargrow May 29, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-AA-355 Chris Otten v DC BZA May 29, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CV-1338 Atlay Brown v Yolanda Raines May 29, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-335 Maria Ramos v. DC DOES  May 28, 2020 Associate Judge Deahl
17-PR-630 Emma M. Govan v. Julie Ebner Brown, et al. May 28, 2020 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
18-CM-386 Nijae Odumn v. United States May 28, 2020 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
20-BG-353 In Re John H. Myers May 28, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-354 In Re Takisha Brown May 28, 2020 Per Curiam
18-CO-367 Lawrence Scott v U.S. May 26, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items