Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CV-408 Hughes v. D.C. Jul 28, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CO-510 Guerra v. United States Jul 28, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-FS-932 In re A.Y. and An.W Jul 24, 2020 Reversed Per Curiam
18-CF-515 Musa v. US Jul 24, 2020 Reversed/Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-227 Holmes v. Welch Family Jul 24, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CM-1156 Glover v. US Jul 23, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CM-859 Robertson v US Jul 23, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CV-1120 & 18-CV-904 Mitrano v. Inova Health Jul 23, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-FM-490 Ramirez v. Salvaterra Jul 23, 2020 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby, Dissenting in part/ Concurring in part Opinion by Associate Judge Glickman
19-CO-548 Payne v. US Jul 23, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items