Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-BG-131 In re David Steinman Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-132 In re Joseph Costello Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-180 In re Majd Ghanayem Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-183 In re James Farrell Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-197 In re Nancy Lord Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
20-BG-217 In re Christopher Mitchell Jul 30, 2020 Per Curiam
19-CV-189 Eisenberg v. Swain Jul 30, 2020 Associate Judge Deahl
18-CO-510 Guerra v. United States Jul 28, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CO-406 Gaston v. United States Jul 28, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-557 Smith v. DC DOES Jul 28, 2020 Vacated/Remanded Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items