Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-AA-899 Mosley v. DC DOES Aug 21, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CF-812 Smallwood v. United States Aug 21, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-CT-442 Cunningham v. District of Columbia Aug 20, 2020 Associate Judge Fisher
17-BG-1463 In re Arron R. Padharia Aug 20, 2020 Per Curiam
17-CF-1347 Burn v. United States Aug 20, 2020 Associate Judge Kravitz, Superior Court of the District of Columbia
19-AA-334 Holdings v. DC ABC Board Aug 20, 2020 Associate Judge McLeese
18-CV-546 Chandler v. Walters Aug 20, 2020 Dismissed Per Curiam
19-CV-11 Little v. DC Public Schools Aug 20, 2020 Dismissed Per Curiam
18-CV-1361 Council & Rollins v. Foster Aug 20, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CM-1039 Moton v. United States Aug 20, 2020 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16205 items