Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CO-0392 Littlepage v. United States Sep 10, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
24-AA-0526 Shea Yeleen Health & Beauty, LLC, et al. v. Office of Wage-Hour, et al. Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Shanker
24-CO-0548 Johnson v. United States Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Shanker
19-CF-0687 Moore v. United States En Banc Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Shanker; concurring opinion by Associate Judge McLeese; concurring opinion by Associate Judge Deahl; dissenting opinion by Associate Judge Easterly
21-CV-0829 Welsch v. McNeil, et al. Sep 04, 2025 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-FS-1042 In re E.A. Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Deahl
24-CT-0276 Flowers v. District of Columbia Sep 04, 2025 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
24-BG-0248 In re Wagner Sep 04, 2025 Per Curiam
23-CF-0344 Picon v. United States Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Shanker
23-CV-0826 Client Earth, et al. v. Washington Gas Light Company (opinion vacated by order dated Dec. 19, 2025, granting petition for rehearing en banc) Sep 04, 2025 Associate Judge Easterly; concurring opinion by Associate Judge Easterly

Pagination

Total 16180 items