Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-BG-1793 In re Howard Moore. Apr 29, 1999
96-CV-1595 National Trade Productions, et al. v. Information Development Corporation, et al. Apr 29, 1999
97-AA-70, 97-AA-572 Donald E. Long, Petitioner, v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board. Apr 29, 1999
97-CV-1224 Martin F. McMahon v. Anderson, Hibey and Blair. Apr 29, 1999
98-FS-1156 In re S.M. Apr 22, 1999
97-FM-1177 Bernard Tyree v. Juanita Evans. Apr 22, 1999
97-CV-1984 Dale Curtis Hogue, Sr. v. Donald J. Hopper, et al. Apr 22, 1999
97-CF-455 Vincent L. White v. United States. Apr 22, 1999
97-BG-1096 In re: Abraham D. Sofaer. Apr 22, 1999
96-CV-618 Henry B.Y. Shin v. Portals Confederation Corporation, et al. Apr 22, 1999

Pagination

Total 16180 items