Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CF-2004 Melson v. US Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-CV-1031 Connelley Corp. v. Kline Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
97-CF-1786 Norris v. US Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-436 Davis v. US Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-FS-1665 In re: K.S Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-FS-1666 In re: M.A.S. Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-CV-964 Hugh Newell Jacobsen v. Amie W. Block. Jan 27, 2000
98-AA-745 Sylvester Couser v. DC Department of Employment Services. Jan 27, 2000
97-CF-793, 97-CF-925, 97-CF-800 Larry Dancy, Michael E. Mason, Jr., and Clayvon D. Anderson v. United States. Jan 27, 2000
95-PR-1008, 96-PR-68, 96-PR-170, 97-PR-94, 97-PR-239, 97-PR-433, 97-PR1437 In re: Estate of Elise P. Derricotte. Gilbert Phillips, v. Ida Bnoden Bryant. Jan 27, 2000

Pagination

Total 16186 items