Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-FS-248 In re: S.L.B. Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
98-CF-1824 Coleman v. US Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
94-CF-1224 Rogers v. US Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
97-CV-1108 Alpha of Virginia v. Steele, Silcox & Bnodening Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
96-CO-1731 Bnoden v. US Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
98-CF-391 Jenkins v. US Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-600 Bernard v. US Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
98-CV-417 Hardy v. DC Feb 02, 2000 Affirmed
99-V-199 Lansing v. Nettles Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-431 Fairley v. US Jan 28, 2000 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16196 items