Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-BG-1207 In re Ekekwe-Kauffman Jan 27, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
20-AA-405 Howard University Hospital, et al. v. District of Columbia DOES and James M. Lyles, Jr. Jan 27, 2022 Senior Judge Fisher
21-BG-854 In re Rich, II Jan 27, 2022 Per Curiam
19-CV-987 Holmes v. District of Columbia Jan 27, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
19-CF-1077 Bingman v. United States Jan 27, 2022 Associate Judge Easterly; dissenting opinion by Senior Judge Fisher
21-BG-703 In re Hoffman Jan 27, 2022 Per Curiam
21-BG-90 In re Infurna Jan 27, 2022 Per Curiam
21-BG-678 In re Shedlick Jan 27, 2022 Per Curiam
19-AA-975 Wilson v. District of Columbia DOES Jan 26, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-1208 Grandy v. United States Jan 20, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16180 items