Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CF-154 Ingram v. US Mar 23, 2000 Affirmed Burgess
98-CV-823 Cousart v. DC Mar 23, 2000 Affirmed Eilperin
99-CO-631 Glover v. US Mar 23, 2000 Affirmed Davis
98-CV-1247 DC v. DC Contract Appeals Board Mar 23, 2000 Dismissed
98-CF-1216 Best v. US Mar 23, 2000 Affirmed Bayly
99-BG-1314 In the Matter of Richard A. James. Mar 23, 2000
98-SP-512 Dequan L. Bogan v. District of Columbia Board of Parole. Mar 23, 2000
94-CF-1240, 98-CO-1087 Eugene R. Busey v. United States of America. Mar 23, 2000
99-BG-229 In re Roger Michael Lindmark. Mar 23, 2000
98-CV-308 Capital City Mortgage Corporation v. Habana Village Art & Folklore, Inc. Mar 23, 2000

Pagination

Total 16196 items