Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CO-1374, 99-CO-780 Coleman v. US Apr 14, 2000 Affirmed Satterfield
98-CV-1492 Faulkner v. Wackenhut Apr 14, 2000 Affirmed Gardner
96-FS-1340 In re: K.S. Apr 13, 2000 Affirmed Abrecht
98-CF-1494 Fleming v. US Apr 13, 2000 Affirmed Milliken
93-CM-1184, 95-CO-254, 96-CO-1971 Steven Spencer v. US Apr 13, 2000
99-CV-407 Quadrangle Development Corporation, QDC Property Management Company v. Otis Elevator Company. Apr 13, 2000
95-CF-912, 98-CO-1545 Roy Thomas v. US Apr 13, 2000
97-CV-1122 Albert Westbrook v. Washington Gas & Light Company. Apr 13, 2000
98-BG-1094 In re: G. Robert Patterson. Apr 13, 2000
98-BG-331 In re: Larry S. Bankston. Apr 13, 2000

Pagination

Total 16196 items