Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-SP-833 Taylor v. Quick Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Wertheim
98-CV-585 Levie v. Gaber Mgmt. Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Levie
98-CM-1302 Gregg v. US Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Mencher
98-CV-1498 Smith v. Boddie Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Dixon
98-CF-1626 Johnson v. US Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Tignor
98-CF-1267 Fields v. US Apr 28, 2000 Affirmed Mize
97-CF-806 Murchison v. US Apr 27, 2000 Affirmed Burgess
97-CO-1199 Warren v. US Apr 27, 2000 Affirmed Walton
98-CV-1873 Ibrahim v. DC Apr 27, 2000 Affirmed Zeldon
97-BG-1454 In re Francisco A. Laguna. Apr 27, 2000

Pagination

Total 16196 items