Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-BG-856 In re Thatcher Mar 03, 2022 Per Curiam
21-BG-848 In re Smith Mar 03, 2022 Per Curiam
20-CV-77 Zuniga v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. Mar 03, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman
18-CM-1191 Ramos v. United States Mar 02, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CV-697 Allen v. Sloan Feb 28, 2022 Affirmed and Remanded Per Curiam
18-CV-949 Reshard v. Stevenson Feb 24, 2022 Associate Judge Beckwith
19-BG-554 In re Paul S. Haar Feb 24, 2022 Associate Judge Easterly
19-CV-565 Sizer, et al., v. Velasquez, et al. Feb 24, 2022 Associate Judge Easterly
18-CF-884 Queen v. United States Feb 24, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CV-159 Benefits Consulting Assoc., Inc. v. Key Star Capital Fund II, LP Feb 23, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16177 items