Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
18-CV-187 & 18-CV-360 District of Columbia v. Bongam, et al.,  Mar 31, 2022 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
22-BG-012 In re Roberts Mar 31, 2022 Per Curiam
19-FM-780 Davis v. Naipaul Mar 30, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-39 Kokayi v. Taylor Mar 29, 2022 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
20-CV-563 May v. International Association of Fire Fighters, et al. Mar 28, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-PR-368 In re Bingham Mar 24, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman
22-BG-44 In re Moshman Mar 24, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-123 In re Babbs, III Mar 24, 2022 Per Curiam
20-FM-209 Kidd v. Scott Mar 24, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CM-241 In re Willie Richardson Mar 24, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16177 items