Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CV-782 McClure v. Partman Apr 11, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-1004, 19-CV-118 & 20-CV-495 Horton v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, et al. Apr 11, 2022 Affirmed and Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
21-AA-387 Bowman v. Children's National Medical Center Apr 11, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CV-356 Gidey v. Settlement Corp., et al Apr 08, 2022 Affirmed and Remanded Per Curiam
22-BG-31 In re Morris Apr 07, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-150 In re Costello Apr 07, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-204 In re Love Apr 07, 2022 Per Curiam
18-AA-718 Roberson v. D.C. Department of Employment Services Apr 06, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-113 In re Chiang Apr 05, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CO-390 Freeland v. United States Apr 05, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16177 items