Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CV-1252 Bussey v. District of Columbia, et al. Apr 21, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-FM-1333 Simon v. Smith Apr 21, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman
22-BG-228 In re Berry Apr 21, 2022 Per Curiam
20-FM-171 Moore v. Monroe, et al., Apr 20, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CF-96 Thomas v. United States Apr 20, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CV-1202 Gordon, et al., v. Forest Hills Neighborhood Alliance, et al. Apr 19, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-PR-596 In re Estate of Henneghan Apr 18, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-BG-134 In re Bonner Apr 14, 2022 Per Curiam
20-FS-770 In re Z.M. Apr 14, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman; Dissent by Associate Judge Deahl
20-CV-455 WMATA v. Nash-Flegler Apr 14, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl

Pagination

Total 16177 items