Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-AA-420 Chun v. Pathfinder International May 09, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-964 Freeman v. United States May 05, 2022 Senior Judge Greene, Superior Court, by designation
22-BG-69 In re Plagmann May 05, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-93 In re Narvaiz May 05, 2022 Per Curiam
19-CV-1237 Plater v. Fisher, et al. May 05, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-FM-155 Zappin v. Comfort May 04, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-1136 Early v. United States May 02, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-AA-591 Baker v. D.C. Department of Employment Services Apr 29, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-AA-129 Hulme, et al. v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment Apr 29, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-BG-70 In re Snyder Apr 28, 2022 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16177 items