Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-CM-111 Morrison v. United States Jul 18, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-FM-546 Versace v. Sears Jul 18, 2022 Affirmed in part and remanded in part Per Curiam
19-CV-98 Sun v. WMATA Jul 15, 2022 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
20-AA-93 Gdula v. D.C. Commission on Human Rights Jul 15, 2022 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
20-CF-223 Abed v. United States Jul 14, 2022 Senior Judge Thompson
20-CM-125 Demumbreum v. United States Jul 14, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-BG-398 In re Osemene Jul 14, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-462 In re PS Botty-Van Den Bruele Jul 14, 2022 Per Curiam
20-CV-13 Adkins Ltd. Partnership v. O St. Management, LLC Jul 14, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
18-CV-1267 FOP v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't Jul 14, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl

Pagination

Total 16179 items