Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-PR-1197 & 20-PR-501 In re Betton Jul 25, 2022 Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part Per Curiam
20-CF-252 Hairston v. United States Jul 22, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-PR-148 In re Wilson Jul 22, 2022 Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part Per Curiam
21-PR-567 In re Cannon Jul 21, 2022 Associate Judge Easterly
18-BG-967 In re Donzinger Jul 21, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-501 In re Blumenfeld Jul 21, 2022 Per Curiam
18-CF-582 Peyton v. United States Jul 21, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman
20-CV-14 Ishakwue v. District of Columbia Jul 21, 2022 Senior Judge Ferren
20-CO-59 Gilliam v. United States Jul 20, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-PR-773 In re Glass Jul 19, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16179 items