Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CO-713 & 20-CO-349 Greene v. United States Aug 04, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
19-BG-555 In re Ponds Aug 04, 2022 Per Curiam
21-CV-620 Geary v. Nat'l Newspaper Publishers Assoc. Aug 04, 2022 Associate Judge AliKhan
21-CV-49 Heskett v. Medstar Georgetown Med. Center, et al. Aug 03, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CV-584 Remus Enterprises 1, LLC v. Capital Equity Pros, LLC Aug 03, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-FM-512 Ajenifuja v. Koepcke Aug 02, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-397 Sneed v. Harris Teeter, LLC Aug 02, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-FM-447 Blount v. Padgett Aug 01, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-534 Valentine v. Saunders Aug 01, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-BG-659 In re Edwards Jul 28, 2022 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16180 items