Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-CV-714 & 20-CV-715 Moon, et al., v. The Family Federation for World Peace Aug 25, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
20-PR-297 In re Florence; Bruce E. Gardner Aug 24, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CV-127 Saxon v. Ameritas Aug 24, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-FM-62 Mahoney v. Mahoney Aug 23, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-357 Caesar v. Westchester Corporation Aug 18, 2022 Associate Judge AliKhan
22-FS-575 In re T.S. Aug 18, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-534 In re Carter Aug 18, 2022 Per Curiam
19-PR-846 In re Robinson; Bruce E. Gardner Aug 18, 2022 Associate Judge McLeese
20-CM-54 & 20-CM-74 Vaughn v. United States; Fludd v. United States Aug 12, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-AA-616 Miranda v. D.C. Department of Employment Services Aug 12, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16180 items