Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-AA-765 WMATA v. D.C. Dep't of Employment Services Sep 26, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-BG-502 In re Uriarte Sep 22, 2022 Per Curiam
20-CV-293 Hoodbhoy v. District of Columbia Sep 22, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl; concurring opinion by Associate Judge Easterly
20-CV-287 & 20-CV-288 Steinke v. P5 Solutions, Inc. Sep 22, 2022 Senior Judge Thompson
22-BG-506 In re Corcoran Sep 22, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-486 In re Bailey Sep 22, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-485 In re Gonzalez Sep 22, 2022 Per Curiam
20-BG-583 In re Klayman Sep 15, 2022 Per Curiam
19-CV-1115 DC MPD v. DC Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) & FOP Sep 15, 2022 Associate Judge McLeese
19-CF-914 Lalchan v. United States Sep 15, 2022 Associate Judge McLeese

Pagination

Total 16180 items