Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
22-BG-628 In re Kardian Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-670 In re Young Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-671 In re Williams Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-672 In re Shoemaker Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-674 In re Ephriam Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-673 In re Hodes Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
21-AA-684 & 21-AA-869 Off. of the People's Counsel for D.C. v. D.C. Public Serv. Comm'n. Nov 10, 2022 Associate Judge Easterly
20-CV-527 Price v. Bd. of Ethics and Gov't Accountability Nov 10, 2022 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
22-BG-670 In re Young Nov 10, 2022 Per Curiam
21-AA-52 Beloved Comm. Alliance v. D.C. Zoning Commission Nov 03, 2022 Associate Judge Glickman

Pagination

Total 16180 items