Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-PR-322 In re Wade Dec 06, 2022 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
21-CV-33 & 21-CV-376 Sun v. D.C. Office of the Tenant Advocate Dec 05, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-FM-586 Scott v. Scott Dec 05, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-223 BWI Hosp. Holdings, LLC v. Crestline Hotels & Resorts, LLC Dec 05, 2022 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
17-CF-1451 Miles v. United States Dec 02, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-547 Josephs v. TCS Investments, LLC, et al. Dec 02, 2022 Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded Per Curiam
22-BG-729 In re Hoffman Dec 01, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-732 In re Yanowitch Dec 01, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-730 In re Swierenga Dec 01, 2022 Per Curiam
22-BG-728 In re Adams Dec 01, 2022 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16184 items