Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-FM-134 Jl. B. v. L.B. and M.S. Dec 15, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
21-CV-240, 21-CV-419, 21-CV-570 & 21-PR-251 Washington v. Allen, Jr., et al. Dec 15, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-111 Katz v. District of Columbia, et al. Dec 15, 2022 Associate Judge Beckwith
22-FM-264 Pleasant v. Gibson Dec 15, 2022 Associate Judge AliKhan
22-CV-94 Berry v. WMATA Dec 12, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-AA-189 Wisdom Once v. D.C. Dep't of Health Care Finance Dec 09, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-BG-831 In re Fabrizio Dec 08, 2022 Per Curiam
21-AA-573 Smith v. D.C. Dept. Of Emp. Services Dec 08, 2022 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
19-CF-482 Headspeth v. United States Dec 08, 2022 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
19-CV-1159 Butler v. MPD Dec 07, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16184 items