Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-CV-746 OverDrive, Inc. v. The Open eBook Forum Jan 26, 2023 Associate Judge Deahl
18-CV-164 Temple v. Waldman, et al. Jan 24, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-872, 18-CV-873 & 19-CV-394 Park. Brahmbhatt Jan 23, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-FM-795 Bowman v. Lewis Jan 23, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-AA-481 Mvuri v. Valet Jan 20, 2023 Reversed Per Curiam
20-CF-221 Sanchez v. United States Jan 19, 2023 Associate Judge McLeese
20-CF-522 Bennett v. United States Jan 19, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-CV-248 & 22-CV-347 Baker v. Washington Area Community Investment Fund Jan 19, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-BG-420 In re Joseph Jan 19, 2023 Per Curiam
22-BS-949 In re Brown Jan 19, 2023 Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16184 items