Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CF-0849 T.W. v. United States Apr 20, 2023 Associate Judge Deahl; Dissenting Opinion by Senior Judge Thompson
23-BG-0068 In re Wright Apr 20, 2023 Per Curiam
21-AA-0823 Sterman v. D.C. Rental Housing Commission Apr 20, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-0845 Rebatchi v. Rebatchi Apr 20, 2023 Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded Per Curiam
17-FS-0893 In re C.M. Apr 20, 2023 Reversed and Remanded Per Curiam
21-CF-0187 Austin v. United States Apr 20, 2023 Associate Judge Deahl
23-BG-0117 In re Rosenberg Apr 20, 2023 Per Curiam
23-BG-0067 IN re Leone Apr 20, 2023 Per Curiam
23-BG-0012 In re Schneider Apr 20, 2023 Per Curiam
19-AA-1013 McNair v. Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center Apr 18, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam

Pagination

Total 16180 items