Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
96-FS-806 In re R.M.C. Aug 27, 1998
97-CV-5 Sarah L. Bnoden v. Consolidated Rail Corporation. Aug 20, 1998
97-CV-261 District of Columbia v. Elijah Karriem. Aug 20, 1998
96-CV-495 Bell Atlantic - Washington, DC, Inc. v. Nazario Construction Co., Inc. Aug 13, 1998
93-CV-407 Katherine Herbert v. District of Columbia. Aug 13, 1998
96-CV-985 Habibah Haqq v. Barbara Jean Dancy-Bey. Aug 13, 1998
96-CV-1720 Bisi Dada v. Children's National Medical Center Aug 13, 1998
97-BG-552 In Re: Richard C. Deering Aug 06, 1998
96-CV-794 N.P.P. Contractors, Inc. v. John Canning & Company Aug 06, 1998
95-CO-998 Cleveland Wright v. United States. Aug 06, 1998