Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
94-CF-981, 94-CF-1059 Louis Bolanos and William Guzman v. United States. Sep 14, 1998
97-CV-193, 97-CV-209 Tierney B. McCracken v. David Walls-Kaufman. Sep 10, 1998
96-BG-1244 In re Karen S. Day. Sep 10, 1998
97-CV-1411, 97-CV-1412 Alan A. D'Ambrosio v. The Colonnade Council of Unit Owners. Sep 10, 1998
97-CV-1109 Valerie Anderson v. Theodore R. George. Sep 10, 1998
97-CO-828 Robert Lee Parrish v. District of Columbia. Sep 10, 1998
96-BG-1504 In re N. Jerome Willingham. Sep 03, 1998
97-CO-425 Anthony E. Bragdon v. United States. Sep 03, 1998
96-CV-1372 Richard B. Steinkamp v. Marjorie Hodson. Sep 03, 1998
96-CV-1373 United Mine Workers of America, International Union v. Jean L. (Marat) Moore. Sep 03, 1998

Pagination

Total 16155 items