Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
93-CF-648, 98-CO-392 Johnny L. Harris v. US Sep 16, 1999
97-CV-1229 Kim Wilson v. Halley Gardens Associates, RCG DC Realty, Inc. and Universal Appliance Company, Inc. Sep 16, 1999
97-CV-1169 Minda Massengale and Jack Massengale v. Marteal Pitts. Sep 16, 1999
97-CV-1065 Abraham A. Roberts v. Howard University, et al. Sep 16, 1999
97-CF-1040 Lamont R. Jones v. US Sep 16, 1999
97-BG-1979, 97-BG-1980 In re: Neal Berger and Frank A.K.Awuah. Sep 16, 1999
97-CV-964, 98-CV-76 Mary E. Raphael, Director, DC Public Library v. Adelaide Okyiri DC Public Library v. Adelaide Okyiri. Sep 16, 1999
98-CF-204 Cochran v. US Sep 15, 1999 Affirmed
97-SP-1112 Jones v. Quick Sep 15, 1999 Affirmed
97-FS-1347 In the matter of M.D. Sep 15, 1999 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16155 items