Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-BG-1991 In re: Liang-Houh Shieh. Oct 07, 1999
97-CV-514 Sheree Foster v. George Washington University Medical Center. Oct 07, 1999
98-BG-547 In re: Robert S. Wolmer. Oct 07, 1999
96-CO-1508 Rocky L. Bnoden v. US Oct 07, 1999
98-BG-1383 In re: Alan F. Post. Oct 07, 1999
97-CO-1184 Wiggins v. US Oct 06, 1999 Affirmed
98-CM-34 McCallum v. US Oct 05, 1999 Affirmed
96-CF-1687, 98-CO-1517 Argueta v. US Oct 05, 1999 Affirmed
97-FS-1576 In re: G.J.P. Oct 05, 1999 Affirmed
96-CV-1073 Lewis v. Purpose, Inc. Sep 30, 1999 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16155 items